Open Question: Would Zach Braff have made a
I know he is not an action actor, but neither was Tobey Maguire when got casted as Peter Parker/Spider-Man in 2000. But does anyone think Zach Braff would have been more fit for the role than Maguire was at the time? If anyone has ever watched Scrubs, you'll know that Zach Braff can pull of an relatable everyman with a terrible identity problem and a marked inferiority complex, but without totally overdoing it like Maguire did at times.
Posted on 14 November 2017 | 4:28 pm
Resolved Question: Is Tobey Maguire still
is Tobey Maguire still Spiderman?
what a shame if is replaced by Peter Parker,he is a excellent spiderman.
Posted on 27 May 2014 | 10:32 pm
Resolved Question: Which Spider-Man movie
And which film do you think had a cooler villain?
For me, Tobey Maguire.
His portrayal of Peter Parker/Spider-Man was the best.
I think what made his portrayal more interesting to watch, is that he portrayed Peter Parker as just a good, average kid, who just happened to receive a special gift, and used it the best way he could.
The 2012's version, made Parker to shy and nervous, no self confidence whatsoever, at least in the beginning of the film.
However I do think Martin Sheen and Sally Field were brilliant choices for the roles of uncle Ben and aunt May.
And nobody can ever top Willem Dafoe as the green goblin.
He made that character live!
What made his villain more interesting, at least to me anyway, is that, even though the guy was insane, due to the lab accident, he still had a fatherly love and concern for his son.
In that respect, I felt his was more realistically relatable.
As even bad men love their children, or at least most do anyway.
What's your opinion?
And just for kicks, what do you think of my description of the character's from the first film?
Posted on 4 April 2013 | 7:09 am
Resolved Question: Poll: Andrew Garfield or
Alright, I know you guys are picking Andrew cause he is more handsome. But I pick Tobey. He has done an awesome job in becoming Spiderman in 2002-2007. Tecnically.. in the villian, I'd have to pick Spider-Man 2002-2007, In the "beauty" of the villian. 2012. In the acting, I think they are the same, but I pick Tobey cause the web swinging and sh*t are epic, in the costume, I prefer 2012.. 2002 is fine but looks too muscular. As for the lovers. (Mary Jane & Gwen Stacy. I prefer Emma Stone.) Enough of that. now I wanna know..what about your opinions?
Also: Do you guys think DaneDeehan is gonna be great in The Amazing Spider-Man 2? I think he's gonna be great! Musn't disrespect the guy.. DaneDeehan is the guy who acted in Chronical..this guy:
Posted on 14 January 2013 | 10:22 pm
Resolved Question: "Brothers"
I just watched it then, i loved it, tobey was so good in this and it was so sad just like how it effected the character and how tobey made it seem so real how he was like this awkward damaged war veteran who was paranoid and losing his mind pretty much.
What did you think of it? And are there any similar movies besides the original one?
Posted on 8 October 2012 | 11:35 pm